🥒 THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF CUCUMBER CRITERION
The first studies attempted to determine whether the cucumber had a criterion of its own.
After seven years of research, three conferences, and a particularly unpleasant argument with a medium-sized cucumber, the Faculty reached a conclusion:
the cucumber does not need to have a criterion.
It only needs to look like it has one.
This discovery forced the Faculty to revise much of the previous cucumber-based methodology.
Nowadays, before beginning any research, a cucumber is placed on the table.
If it falls to the left, the hypothesis is considered premature.
If it falls to the right, it is considered interesting.
If it does not fall, it is considered valid.
The Faculty has been unable to explain this system.
It does not consider this necessary.
⚠️ NOTE TO STUDENTS
Do not argue with the cucumber.
The Faculty has already tried.
It did not end well.
